Archive

Detective: Mt. Pleasant Township woman lied when she said officer punched her | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Detective: Mt. Pleasant Township woman lied when she said officer punched her

Paul Peirce
webpolice5
Pixabay

Westmoreland County detectives allege that a Mt. Pleasant Township woman made up a complaint that she was punched by a Scottdale Borough police officer following her arrest in April.

Nicole M. Spor, 32, was charged with making false reports to law enforcement authorities by Detective Richard Kranitz after alleging to the district attorney’s office that she was physically assaulted by borough patrolman Thomas Mortimer following her April 18 arrest for disorderly conduct and attempted escape.

Kranitz alleges that Spor accused Mortimer on May 22 of turning off his body camera while he transported her to the Westmoreland County Prison β€œand punched her on her left eye.”

Kranitz reported in court documents that borough patrol cars also are equipped with cameras that tape records prisoners in the back seat of patrol cars. Kranitz said police provided him with the video and it refuted Spor’s claims.

β€œ(Spor) was not punched and custody was transferred to the (prison) correction officers in the normal procedure,” Kranitz wrote.

Spor was served the complaint via mailed summons.

Norvelt District Judge Roger Eckels has scheduled a preliminary hearing for Spor on the false report complaint for Aug. 2.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.