Archive

Doctor arrested on drug charges in Clarion County | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Doctor arrested on drug charges in Clarion County

A Clarion psychiatrist who operated four Suboxone maintenance clinics in northwestern Pennsylvania was arrested Tuesday on charges of illegally prescribing and distributing pills in exchange for money and sex.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane identified Dr. Thomas Radecki, 67, as the largest purchaser and distributor of Subutex in the United States.

Subutex and Suboxone are commonly used to treat opiate dependency.

The investigation resulted in the closure of his clinics in Clarion, Venango, Mc-Kean and Clearfield counties.

A statewide investigating grand jury recommended the criminal charges, Kane said.

According to the presentment, Radecki operated the clinics under the name Doctors and Lawyers for a Drug Free Youth to dispense and sell controlled substances, including Subutex, Adderall and Ritalin, drugs commonly used to treat symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Agents estimate that in 2011 and 2012, Radecki purchased and distributed more than 183,000 doses of Subutex, 19,000 doses of Adderall and 28,000 doses of Ritalin, with a total estimated street value of more than $5 million.

Evidence disclosed that many patients did not use the medications sold by Radecki, but instead resold the pills, Kane said.

Radecki is accused of having inappropriate physical contact and sexual relationships with multiple female patients, including some who lived and worked at his clinics, investigators said.

He is charged with prescribing outside accepted treatment principles, participating in a corrupt organization, criminal conspiracy, dealing in unlawful proceeds, theft by deception and insurance fraud.

Radecki was arraigned and released on $25,000 bail.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.