ShareThis Page
Fayette man accused of leading police on 20-mile chase that ended near Ligonier |

Fayette man accused of leading police on 20-mile chase that ended near Ligonier

Renatta Signorini
| Tuesday, December 18, 2018 7:33 a.m

A Fayette County man is accused of leading numerous police agencies on a chase for about 20 miles that ended near Ligonier.

Anthony Dylan Myers, 26, of Markleysburg, is being held at the Somerset County Jail on $20,000 bail. He is charged with fleeing from police, driving an unregistered vehicle, speeding and numerous other summary vehicle code violations.

Troopers said in a news release that they tried to conduct a traffic stop just before noon on Thursday on Route 601 in Somerset Township, Somerset County. Myers allegedly fled on a motorcycle and troopers and officers from Jennerstown, Loyalhanna and Ligonier borough and township chased after him.

The pursuit ended when Myers pulled over on Route 30 between Laughlintown and Ligonier at the intersection of Route 381. Police said the chase occurred while troopers were searching for a bank robbery suspect in an unrelated incident that happened in Maryland earlier that day.

Myers did not have an attorney listed in online court records. A preliminary hearing is set for today.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.