Forensic scientist testifies in Greensburg murder/torture death penalty trial |

Forensic scientist testifies in Greensburg murder/torture death penalty trial

Melvin Knight

Investigators found no physical evidence that a mentally disabled woman was raped days before she was stabbed to death in 2010, a witness testified Wednesday at the death penalty trial for one of six Greensburg roommates convicted in the murder.

Forensic scientist Sarah Kinneer told jurors an examination of evidence collected during the autopsy of 30-year-old Jennifer Daugherty revealed no genetic material or DNA to suggest she was raped during the course of her captivity.

“A lack of evidence is not unusual in sexual assault cases,” Kinneer said.

Her testimony came during the third day of the resentencing trial for Melvin Knight, 29, formerly of Swissvale, Allegheny County, who pleaded guilty six years ago to the 2010 torture slaying of Daugherty. Prosecutors said Knight fatally stabbed Daugherty, who had been held captive for more than two days, beaten and tortured before she was killed.

For the second time, the prosecution is seeking a death sentence for Knight. In 2012, he was given the death penalty, but in 2016 a state appeals court vacated that penalty and ordered a new sentencing trial.

Prosecutors contend Knight raped Daugherty during her captivity. While he was never charged with a sexual assault, District Attorney John Peck said jurors should consider it as a reason to impose the death penalty.

Kinneer was questioned at length by Assistant District Attorney Leo Ciaramitaro about why no physical evidence of rape was found. She testified physical evidence of a sexual assault could have been washed away or eliminated if a rape occurred several days before Daugherty’s death. She also suggested not all sexual assaults result in bodily fluids being left behind.

Knight previously denied raping Daugherty but has not contested his role in the killing. Knight claims he is ineligible for the death penalty because of a low intellect and a history of mental illness.

Investigators contend Daugherty was killed in the bathroom of the Pennsylvania Avenue apartment where she was held by Knight and his roommates. Evidence that attempts were made to clean blood from throughout the apartment were found during the investigation, according to testimony Wednesday from retired Westmoreland County Detective Hugh Shearer.

Knight’s sentencing trial is expected to continue Thursday before Judge Rita Hathaway.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.