Funding cutbacks could limit Westmoreland Bar Association’s pro bono program |

Funding cutbacks could limit Westmoreland Bar Association’s pro bono program

Rich Cholodofsky
John Ranker, attorney at John M. Ranker & Associates in downtown Greensburg, is the new president of the Westmoreland Bar Association.

Funding cutbacks could limit or potentially shutter the Westmoreland County Bar Association’s pro bono program, which provides free legal representation for low-income residents, officials said Wednesday.

The mostly volunteer program operates out of offices at the Westmoreland County Courthouse in Greensburg and last year handled more than 3,500 cases, according to Executive Director David Millstein.

Volunteer lawyers are used to handle domestic, custody and civil matters, including landlord-tenant disputes and property issues. It operates on an annual donation from the county’s bar association and funding from its separate charitable arm, the Westmoreland Bar Foundation.

The foundation pulled its annual allocation, about $45,000, Millstein said, leaving the office with its staff of one full-time and one part-time employee without enough money to continue its current scope of operations.

“I have yet to see any concrete proposal that will secure enough funding to keep the office operating,” Millstein said.

Millstein receives no pay for his role as executive director of the office.

Bar Association President John Ranker conceded that the foundation’s decision to halt funding has resulted in an uncertainty of how the pro bono office will function into 2019, but said there are no current plans to shutter the operation.

“We believe there are still enough funds available for us to continue operating,” Ranker said.

The office currently operates with a $90,000 annual budget, according to Millstein.

David DeRose, a Greensburg lawyer who serves as chairman of the bar foundation, said funding sources used to pay for the pro bono office have dried up.

“With the rising costs of a very successful program, we’ve expanded and took it to a new level. But that came with an additional expense,” DeRose said. “We’re trying to figure out another way to keep it in place the same way it operates now or something similar.”

Tax returns filed by the Westmoreland Bar Foundation in 2016, the last year publicly available, showed the organization listed more than $688,000 in total assets while generating less than $70,000 in new contributions.

DeRose said without additional funding sources, the foundation can no longer pay the current price tag for the program.

“We have to operate from within a budget. If we continue to operate in the fashion we’ve been operating, with no new resources, the foundation resources will be depleted,” DeRose said. In addition to the pro bono program, the foundation finances scholarships and other charitable activities throughout the county.

Ranker said early discussions to keep the program operating have involved using bar association staff to handle administrative duties out of the organization’s Greensburg offices, while still keeping a presence at the courthouse.

Additional efforts to secure more funding are ongoing, Ranker said.

“That’s the worst-case scenario, the cutbacks, but our goal is to continue the pro bono program. It’s a good program and it helps a whole lot of people in our community that need the service. It’s a very valuable service to the community,” Ranker said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.