Archive

Greensburg man charged with assaulting woman, police officers | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Greensburg man charged with assaulting woman, police officers

Paul Peirce
webhandcuffsdark

A Greensburg man accused of assaulting two city police officers Sunday evening was ordered held in the Westmoreland County Prison on $75,000 bond.

Ronald E. Meidinger, 27, is charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, resisting arrest, strangulation, disorderly conduct, harassment, criminal mischief and public drunkenness following the incident in the 700 block of Eastmont Street.

Patrolmen Hank Fontana Jr. and Elliott Fejes reported in court documents that they responded to a report of a domestic disturbance outside an apartment and observed Meidinger arguing with a 31-year-old woman on a porch. The woman’s 2-year-old toddler was nearby, the officers reported.

Meidinger “smelled of alcoholic beverages” and had trouble maintaining his balance when questioned, Fontana reported.

Meidinger initially complied with police requests and questions and stepped away from the victim, but then became belligerent and combative with officers, Fontana reported.

He ignored repeated commands to stop as he walked closer to the victim and child, and began swinging at the officers “with clenched fists,” Fontana wrote in court documents.

The officers reported that they physically restrained Meidinger and placed him in handcuffs. Neither officer was seriously injured.

The victim later told police that Meidinger pushed her onto a couch during an argument and began choking her before she freed herself and ran outside and asked a neighbor to call police.

Meidinger’s hearing is scheduled for July 5.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.