Greensburg woman pleads guilty to taking money from men who molested 3-year-old girl |

Greensburg woman pleads guilty to taking money from men who molested 3-year-old girl

Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Rebecca Shadle: Police say two men agreed to pay her $60 to kiss and molest a young girl.

A Greensburg woman could serve up to 60 years in prison for human trafficking after she pleaded guilty Tuesday to allowing men to have sex with a 3-year-old girl.

Rebecca Shadle, 39, will ask a Westmoreland County judge to decide how much time she spends in prison. She rejected a plea deal for a 10- to 20-year prison sentence with an additional seven years of probation.

Instead, Shadle pleaded guilty to four charges — trafficking of a minor for sexual purposes, child endangerment, aggravated indecent assault and conspiracy.

Prosecutors said Shadle allowed men to pay her to have sexual contact with the girl. Specifically, police said two men agreed to pay Shadle $60 to kiss and touch the child in a sexual manner.

Prosecutors said the incidents occurred between 2013 and January 2017 at Shadle’s Greensburg apartment in Eastmont Estates. Shadle’s then-estranged husband, Scott Shadle, pleaded guilty in February with promoting prostitution and was sentenced to serve two to 23 months in jail. He has since been paroled.

Assistant District Attorney Judy Petrush said she will ask the judge to order Rebecca Shadle to serve at least 10 to 20 years in prison.

“This was a vulnerable child who was the victim on ongoing abuse,” Petrush said.

The two men police said paid Rebecca Shadle to have sexual contact with the child also were charged. David Allen Smith, 38, of Greensburg pleaded guilty to charges that he had sexual contact with a child and was sentenced to serve nine to 23 months in jail.

Brian Keith Spillar was charged with identical offenses, but Petrush said he died before he could be prosecuted.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.