Archive

Hunter rescued by boat after slipping into Sewickley Creek | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Hunter rescued by boat after slipping into Sewickley Creek

Patrick Varine
482277gtrWaterRescue112718
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
A swift water rescue crew performs evacuations along Sewickley Creek in Lowber in September 2018. On Monday, Nov. 26, 2018, a hunter had to be rescued after slipping into the creek and being carried to the opposite bank by the current.

A hunter was rescued by boat Monday afternoon, after he slipped into Sewickley Creek in Sewickley Township.

Two men were hunting when one of them ended up in the creek shortly after 4 p.m. near the 100 block of Lowber Road.

“The victim was pretty much stuck on a hillside on the opposite side of the creek from our access, and from where he was hunting,” said Michael Manley, assistant chief for the Sutersville Volunteer Fire Department. “Bystanders said he somehow slipped into the water, and the current took him to that side of the creek.”

Manley said the creek was running at about five feet deep. The man was able to get out of the water, but had no way to get back across.

“It was just a steep cliff,” Manley said. “There was no way to get down to him from the top, so we had to take the boat across.”

After being assessed by emergency responders, the man was taken to a local hospital.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.