ShareThis Page
Jeannette woman charged with stealing $220K from mother, spending $50K on psychics |

Jeannette woman charged with stealing $220K from mother, spending $50K on psychics

A Jeannette woman has been charged with draining $220,400 from her ailing mother’s bank accounts and spending more than $50,000 of the money on a California-based psychic hotline, authorities said Friday.

Teri Lyn Padgett, 57, in February began taking money from accounts her mother maintained at the Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union in Hempfield, according to West-moreland County Detective Ray Dupilka.

“Her mother suffers from dementia and requires supervised care within her own home. Padgett had power of attorney over her mother’s assets and used that to gain access to her … accounts,” Dupilka said.

Authorities said they were contacted in July by officials at the Westmoreland County Area Agency on Aging who noticed unusual activity in the victim’s accounts.

More than $53,000 was directed from the accounts to California Psychics, court documents indicate. Another $17,936 was deposited into Padgett’s personal bank account and a $148,678 annuity payment made in July to the victim was transferred to another personal bank account owned by the suspect, Dupilka said.

Other payments with the victim’s money were made to cover specialized cable services, credit card debt and fees for an online astrology service, court documents show.

The county agency has been appointed by the courts as guardian of the victim, who has been moved into a facility operated by the agency.

Padgett was arraigned before North Huntingdon District Judge Wayne Gongaware and ordered held in the county prison after failing to post $20,000 bond. Padgett’s preliminary hearing is scheduled for Nov. 3.

The state maintains a toll-free elder abuse hotline at 1-800-490-8505. All tips remain confidential.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.