ShareThis Page
Latrobe bridge traffic restriction ahead for final rehab work |

Latrobe bridge traffic restriction ahead for final rehab work

Jeff Himler
Jeff Himler | Tribune-Review
Vehicles head south on Route 981, crossing a bridge over the Loyalhanna Creek in Latrobe, on Oct. 27, 2017. The bridge's southbound lane reopened the previous day after being closed since the previous spring as part of a PennDOT rehabilitation project.

Motorists are no doubt anxious for a break from ice- and snow-covered roads.

But in Latrobe, the arrival of better weather could come with a downside for drivers — the next phase of construction on the Route 981 (Lloyd Avenue) bridge across the Loyalhanna Creek and the restart of a detour for traffic headed south out of town on that route.

District 12 spokesman Ray Deep acknowledged PennDOT would like contractor Mosites Construction to resume work on the bridge later in February, if possible. But, he said, officials are waiting for relocation of a utility line.

Construction plans are “up in the air until they move it,” he said.

Peoples Natural Gas will have to close traffic on the bridge for two days to move its line, according to city manager Wayne Jones.

“The company is waiting until they can safely turn off the gas,” he said. “They need two days of 55- to 60-degree weather and also warm evenings.”

Traffic on the bridge has flowed both directions since late October, when Mosites completed most of the rehabilitation work on the downstream side of the span.

When work resumes and switches to the upstream side, the bridge will be closed to all southbound traffic and to northbound truck traffic. Also expected to resume is the official detour using Industrial Boulevard and Routes 982 and 30.

A target date for completion is unknown, Deep said.

“There are a lot of different factors involved,” he said.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.