Latrobe man gets 14 years for stealing $50,000 worth of jewelry from homes |

Latrobe man gets 14 years for stealing $50,000 worth of jewelry from homes

Rich Cholodofsky
Mark Stout, 35, of Latrobe is accused of stealing thousands of pieces of jewelry in home burglaries.
Paul Peirce
Latrobe Police DetectiveJohn Sleasman examines numerous boxes of jewelry recovered during an investigation into multiple break-ins in Latrobe. Mark Stout, 35, pleaded guilty to his role in the break-ins Wednesday, June 27, 2018.

A Latrobe man will serve up to 14 years in prison for his role in a jewelry-stealing spree through five Latrobe homes last year.

Mark A. Stout, 36, pleaded guilty Wednesday to the burglaries in which he and his girlfriend were accused of breaking into city homes and walking off with cash, jewelry, guns and other property valued at more than $50,000.

Westmoreland County Common Pleas Judge Tim Krieger approved a plea bargain for Stout, but rejected a proposed deal for his girlfriend, Calie Ann Rafferty, which would have required her to serve up to three years in prison.

Police said Stout and Rafferty searched out homes in the northern end of the city during daytime hours when nobody was at those residences.

Pamela Korchok said she found the front door of her home forced open and discovered several pieces of jewelry, some with value far beyond their worth, had been taken.

“It terrified me,” Korchok said in court on Wednesday. “Some of those items I lost I was given when I was a kid, and they can never be replaced.”

Stout, who had a lengthy prior criminal record, pleaded guilty to burglary, theft and conspiracy charges. Krieger sentenced him to serve seven to 14 years in prison.

Rafferty, 42, was set to plead guilty to identical charges in return for a jail term of 15 months to three years. The judge refused to accept the deal, saying the proposed sentence was not long enough.

Defense attorney Jim Robinson argued that Rafferty, who had no prior criminal record was not as culpable as Stout for the burglaries. Robinson said Rafferty spiraled out of control after she became addicted to drugs at Stout’s urging.

“She was very much doing what Mr. Stout said,” Robinson said.

Assistant District Attorney Rebecca Calisti said the plea offer to Rafferty was based on her clean criminal record and that additional negotiations will continue in an attempt to resolve the case. A trial date for her has not been scheduled.

“I believe they were both equally responsible for these,” Calisti said.

Police said the couple operated in the Latrobe area during late 2017 and pawned many of the stolen items at shops in Belle Vernon, Monroeville and Charleroi.

In December, police received a tip that some of the stolen items had been pawned in Charleroi. Stout was identified in a surveillance video at the pawn store, according to police.

The couple was later spotted by police as they appeared to canvass homes in Latrobe, according to court records.

A search of their Ligonier Street home in Latrobe found what police said were thousands of pieces of stolen jewelry.

Stout was ordered to repay his victims for the stolen items but a final amount owed still must be determined, Calisti said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.