Latrobe woman, 80, charged with theft of $36,000 in charity funds |

Latrobe woman, 80, charged with theft of $36,000 in charity funds

Patrick Varine
Tomislav Forgo

An 80-year-old Latrobe woman is accused of stealing more than $36,000 over a three-year period from a St. Vincent de Paul charity account set up to help the needy.

State police on Tuesday charged Eleanor Wallak, 80, of Latrobe with one count of theft by unlawful taking, alleging that she set bank accounts for the St. Vincent de Paul Conference at St. Florian Church in United.

A “conference” is a group of volunteers “who work as a team to provide concrete aid and comfort to their neighbors in need,” according to the Society of St. Vincent de Paul Council of Pittsburgh’s website.

Wallak had sole access to the funds, according to a criminal complaint.

“The accused stole/misused the funds for her own benefit or the benefit of her family,” the complaint reads. Wallak allegedly took money by way of ATM withdrawals, bank transfers, online purchases and point-of-sale-purchases, totaling $36,107.

The Rev. John Sedlak, pastor at St. Florian, said he had no comment on the charges.

An attorney for Wallak is not listed in court documents, and she could not be reached for comment.

A preliminary hearing date has not been set.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.