Laurel Mountain State Park ski plans will go to Ligonier Township supervisors |

Laurel Mountain State Park ski plans will go to Ligonier Township supervisors

Plans to restore the ski facilities at Laurel Mountain State Park will go before the Ligonier Township supervisors for approval in November.

Township manager Terry Carcella said Thursday that a decision on the proposed plans should not have been postponed at a planning commission meeting this week because the architect and engineer for the project were seeking only a modification to a previously approved plan.

At that meeting, architect Cherie H. Moshier of Moshier Studio in Pittsburgh and engineer Keith Gindlesperger of H.F. Lenz Co. in Johnstown described changes to the plan, which include swapping out a snow-tubing park and parking lot and refocusing on skiing facilities.

Questions about a sewage and storm-water maintenance agreement reached in 2012 between the township and the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources prompted Moshier and Gindlesperger to ask for a 90-day waiver to look into the agreement.

Carcella researched the history of the project and found that supervisors approved a land development plan for the park in 2011.

What Moshier and Gindlesperger proposed on Tuesday is considered a modification, Carcella said.

Carcella sent a memo to the planning commission and supervisors informing them of the change in procedure.

“This is an important project to the community,” Carcella said. “It shouldn’t be delayed in any manner because of a modification issue.”

Carcella said township officials will further examine the stormwater and sewage maintenance agreement to determine what the township’s role will be.

A grading permit from the township zoning department is still required for the project, he said.

“We know everybody would like to see this start construction and reopen soon,” Moshier said Thursday.

Gindlesperger did not return a request for comment.

Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.