ShareThis Page
Lower Burrell, Jeannette veterans groups boycott NFL broadcasts |

Lower Burrell, Jeannette veterans groups boycott NFL broadcasts

Pittsburgh Steelers players stand in the tunnel during the playing of the national anthem before an NFL football game against the Chicago Bears, Sunday, Sept. 24, 2017, in Chicago. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)
Mary Ann Thomas | Tribune-Review
A sign on the Lower Burrell VFW Post 92 notifying members of an NFL boycott on Sunday, Nov. 12, 2017.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers team stands behind Alejandro Villanueva in the tunnel during the national anthem before their loss to the Bears on Sunday, Sept. 24, 2017, at Soldier Field in Chicago.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger leads the team out of the tunnel after the National Anthem before the Bears Sunday, Sept. 24, 2017 at Soldier Field in Chicago Il.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers players stand for the singing of the national anthem Sunday before their game against the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium, Sunday, Oct. 1, 2017.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers stand for the national anthem before playing the Ravens on Sunday, Oct. 1, 2017, at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore.

Lower Burrell and Jeannette veterans organizations will boycott the Pittsburgh Steelers game Sunday amid a national boycott of all NFL games as part of Veterans Day observances this weekend.

Groups representing veterans across the country have previously boycotted games after some NFL players knelt during the national anthem in protest of police brutality.

Earlier in the football season, the American Legion, the nation’s largest veterans’ organization, called the athletes who failed to show respect for the national anthem as “misguided and ungrateful.”

The Lower Burrell Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 92 will not show the broadcast of Sunday’s 1 p.m. matchup between the Steelers and the Indianapolis Colts because of “the lack of respect by the NFL of our flag and our country,” according to a sign on the Lower Burrell VFW’s door at its Wildlife Lodge Road site.

The VFW leadership made the change “just to respect Veterans Day weekend and to respect the people who fought for this country and to preserve the freedom we have now,” said Lower Burrell VFW Commander Lee Johnson, who served in Vietnam.

This is the first time the Lower Burrell VFW has boycotted NFL games.

The Jeannette VFW also will boycott Sunday’s game, although the action is not part of the national movement, according to Curt Elliott, commander of Jeannette’s VFW Post 8240.

During the organization’s monthly meeting a few weeks ago, the board unanimously agreed to boycott all NFL games this weekend.

“It’s a protest of the NFL player kneeling, which we find disrespectful,” Elliott said. “We don’t have a problem with them protesting. They should do it on their own time, not while they’re working.”

Although the American Legion has been protesting the NFL players’ behavior during the national anthem, they are not behind Sunday’s boycott, according to a recent interview with the Legion in the Indianapolis Star.

But the Lower Burrell American Legion is following suit with the VFW and for the first time will not show the NFL games on Sunday.

“It’s our statement against the disrespect for the flag and disrespect for the country,” said Terry Scheftic, 66, of Lower Burrell, an officer and historian of the club.

The Facebook page “Boycott the NFL” advocates not watching this Sunday’s NFL games to “honor our military, many of whom come home with a flag draped over their coffin.”

About 78,000 people “liked” the post for boycotting this weekend’s game, while the site attracted more than 230,000 people who also “liked” the page.

“Until millionaire football players stop protesting the national anthem of the United States, we’ll be here,” the Facebook page states. “We love football, but we love our flag more.”

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4691.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.