Murrysville approves long-debated fracking ordinance |

Murrysville approves long-debated fracking ordinance

Patrick Varine

Murrysville council members voted 6-1 Wednesday night to approve their pending fracking ordinance, which places setbacks at 750 feet from any protected structure to the edge of a well pad.

The vote brings to a close seven years of work on the ordinance — at least for now. Several council members noted that the result of ongoing state court cases could prompt them to revisit it.

“This is a significant improvement for Murrysville,” Councilman Loren Kase said. “We’ve raised the bar in the Pittsburgh area, which is why I’m sure some people didn’t want to see this happen.”

Councilman Tony Spadaro pointed out that Murrysville’s ordinance is stricter than any nearby communities, all of which measure setbacks from a well bore hole.

“We measure from the well pad,” Spadaro said. “No one else is doing that, and so when you consider where bore holes are compared to the well pad edge, there’s an additional 200 feet beyond our setback.”

Councilwoman Jamie Lee Korns agreed.

“I think the people who are saying we reduced our setback — when you look at the facts, that’s just not true,” she said.

Council President Joan Kearns was not so sure.

“We spent a heck of a lot of time reaching 800 feet as our setback, and to suddenly make a left-hand turn from that, down to 600 and finally reaching 750 feet. That really rankled me,” she said. “It’s not as much as we’d like, but it’s better than (the state minimum of) 500 feet. But to me, it was kind of like dirty pool.”

Councilman David Perry cast the lone vote against the ordinance, citing his concern that it does not go far enough in protecting residents.

“My perspective after 30 years as an environmental consultant is you have to look at the ‘what-ifs,’ and you have to be protective of those,” he said.

Resident Alyson Holt, who has circulated petitions asking council to increase fracking setbacks, said in her view, the ordinance is “not a compromise. It’s a sellout to the gas industry.”

“Every concession for the past 20 months has been to pro-drilling interests,” she said. “At every turn in the process since September 2015, and despite receiving petitions from over 600 individual Murrysville residents urging more protective setbacks, changes have consistently favored the gas industry.”

Lee Korns said council did what was in its power.

“I believe we’ve done all we can to protect residents while allowing for reasonable use of this industry, as required by state law,” she said.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. He can be reached at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.