North Huntingdon parish sells property for $575,000 |

North Huntingdon parish sells property for $575,000


A North Huntingdon church reaped $575,000 from the recent sale of 2.45 acres along Leger Road in North Huntingdon.

Westmoreland County property records show on Nov. 2, Bishop Edward Malesic of the Greensburg diocese signed off on the sale of property near St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Church in North Huntingdon to Waste Management Disposal Services of Pennsylvania.

Regional Waste Management spokeswoman Erica Deyarmin said the company had been leasing the property adjacent to its North Huntingdon offices for overflow parking and plans to continue that use.

Although Malesic signed the deed on behalf of the St. Elizabeth Ann Seton parish charitable trust, diocesan spokesman Jerry Zufelt said the proceeds of the sale accrued to the parish, not the diocese.

Malesic has said, if need be, the diocese will tap its reserves or sell assets to underwrite the cost of a compensation fund it is establishing to make reparations to individuals who were sexually abused by clergy in the past.

He stressed that no parish assets would be tapped for the fund.

Zufelt said no diocesan properties currently are on the market.

Greensburg is among a number of dioceses across the state that opted to create compensation funds to pay reparations to abuse survivors, many of whom were barred from court by the statute of limitations.

Final negotiations for the launch of the Greensburg diocese fund — to be administered by Washington, D.C., lawyer Kenneth Feinberg — are expected to be complete early next year.

The Pittsburgh diocese, which also has engaged Feinberg to administer payments, said it will announce the details of its compensation fund later this week.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer.
You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, [email protected] or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.