ShareThis Page
Penn-Trafford teachers may strike over contract dispute |

Penn-Trafford teachers may strike over contract dispute

Penn-Trafford High School

Penn-Trafford’s 3,800 students could find themselves caught in a teachers strike “sooner rather than later” because of a disputed tentative agreement, the teachers’ union president said.

Union leaders could call for a strike as early as the end of the week, said Shaun Rinier, president of the 250-member Penn-Trafford Education Association. The group held a membership meeting Tuesday.

While members previously authorized the union officers to call a strike, it must give the school district a 48-hour notice before walking off the job, Rinier said.

Penn-Trafford Superintendent Matthew Harris in a statement Wednesday said the school board will meet with union negotiators Monday. The central administration also will work with the board “to generate a new offer,” he said.

“We are looking into having (salary) step movement,” Harris said.

Teachers are working under an extension of a four-year pact that expired June 30. They planned to vote on a six-year tentative agreement Thursday, but that has been canceled, Rinier said.

“We had everything in place to take a vote,” Rinier said.

The union opposes the final draft of the agreement, which would prevent teachers already on the first level of the 17-step salary scale from advancing to another level this school year, Rinier said. The union did not discover that contract language until recently, and Rinier said he could not remember any discussion of that clause during negotiations. If there was discussion, the details were not made clear, Rinier said.

“That’s non-negotiable,” Rinier said. “That’s an issue worth going on strike for.”

Harris said union negotiators this week rejected the same tentative agreement they had accepted Sept. 10. While the proposed agreement did not move teachers on steps 1 through 16 for the first year, it did give teachers a raise from the 2017-18 school year.

The framework for the tentative agreement — the salaries and benefits — would give teachers an average annual raise of about 3 percent in the six years, Rinier said. Teachers on the first step of the salary scale make about $43,000, and those on the 17th step are paid about $90,000, Rinier said.

By the end of the proposed six-year contract, Harris said teachers at the top of the scale with a master’s degree would be paid $104,000 — a $10,500 increase.

To save the district money, Rinier said the union had proposed offering teachers an early retirement incentive for the end of the 2017-18 school year, but that was not accepted.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.