Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board suspends in-store tastings |

Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board suspends in-store tastings

Customers who have enjoyed a sip of a white Burgundy or pinot noir at weekly staff-led wine tastings at state wine and spirits stores will find the supply dried up for the next few weeks.

The state Liquor Control Board suspended in-store tastings led by staff in order to evaluate the program, ensure consistency from store to store and convert the paper-based training to an electronic format, spokeswoman Stacy Kriedeman said.

The decision was made this week, Kriedeman said, but tastings could resume “in the next couple weeks.”

Tastings of wine, flavored vodka and other spirits led by vendors will continue, she said.

“We hired a number of new retail wine specialists recently and wanted to take the opportunity to evaluate the program to make sure that they are all providing a consistent in-store tasting experience, and everyone is familiar with all of the policies and procedures,” Kriedeman said.

The LCB began the retail wine specialist program in July 2012 and, to date, has stationed 76 experts wearing green aprons at stores statewide. At least eight specialists have been added recently as well as a few others on temporary assignment, Kriedeman said.

The program aims to assist and teach customers about wine.

Wine specialists are civil-service positions with salaries ranging from mid-$30,000s to mid-$50,000s. They undergo at least three LCB training courses, with the option to take additional classes, and are tasked with answering questions, offering recommendations, hosting weekly wine tastings and compiling email newsletters detailing new products and drink recipes.

“This continues to be a very popular program,” Kriedeman said.

Kari Andren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2856 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.