Police apprehend student after Snapchat post shuts down Franklin Regional schools |

Police apprehend student after Snapchat post shuts down Franklin Regional schools

Jacob Tierney

The student who authorities believe posted a threatening Snapchat photo that shut down the Franklin Regional School District on Friday is in custody, according to Murrysville police.

He is being taken for a mental health evaluation and probably will not be charged with a crime, Chief Thomas Seefeld said.

The district canceled classes and told staff to stay home Friday after seeing the photo of a hand holding a gun on the popular image-sharing social media app with the caption, “It’s almost time.”

Officers from Murrysville, Turtle Creek and Allegheny County police departments apprehended the student at a Turtle Creek home at about 9 a.m. Friday.

Police did not identify the 17-year-old student, who made the Snapchat post late Thursday. Police were informed of the post within minutes.

There was no direct threat toward students, teachers or staff, Seefeld said.

District officials announced Friday morning that classes were being canceled out of an “abundance of caution” and told all personnel not to show up for work.

The student has been identified and an investigation is ongoing, according to police.

The district would not comment on the threat and directed questions to police, spokeswoman Cara Zanella said.

Nearby school districts took extra precautions Friday after the threat.

Greensburg police said they would increase police presence at Greensburg Salem schools because of the threat at Franklin Regional.

Plum Borough District went on an “external lockdown,” heavily restricting who could come and go throughout the day.

The photo was posted the day after a former student killed 17 people at a South Florida high school.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.