Archive

Police: Beaver Falls man had crystal meth during traffic stop in Penn Borough | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Police: Beaver Falls man had crystal meth during traffic stop in Penn Borough

Renatta Signorini
487234PoliceCarB
487234PoliceLights34

A Tuesday night traffic stop for running a stop sign in Penn Borough led to new drug charges against a Beaver Falls man already wanted by police.

Officers pulled over a car driven by Clinton Paul Klinesmith, 30, after he allegedly ran a stop sign at Coal and Youghiogheny streets just before 11 p.m. Inside, police found 26 grams of suspected crystal methamphetamine and a “blue granular chunky substance” which authorities could not identify, as well as Suboxone films, needles, empty stamp bags and a scale, according to court documents.

Klinesmith claimed to have been lost and said he was visiting a friend. Investigators said Klinesmith’s license had been suspended due to having expired in 2004 and that he had five bench warrants for his arrest on traffic-related offenses.

A cell phone in the car showed “openly displayed text-based communications … indicating pending drug transactions,” Sgt. Eric Colamarino reported.

Klinesmith is charged with possession with intent to deliver, criminal use of a communication facility and other offenses. He is being held in the Westmoreland County Prison on $50,000 bail. A Dec. 6 preliminary hearing is set. He did not have an attorney listed in online court records.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.