ShareThis Page
Remains of Vandergrift woman bludgeoned, burned in 2017 ordered to be returned to family |

Remains of Vandergrift woman bludgeoned, burned in 2017 ordered to be returned to family

Rich Cholodofsky
| Tuesday, December 18, 2018 5:36 p.m

Nearly two years after police discovered the charred remains of a Vandergrift woman in a remote wooded area of Derry Township, her family will finally regain custody of her body.

The remains of Ronny Cable will be released to a Latrobe funeral home, Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Tim Krieger ordered on Tuesday. Her body has been in the custody of Coroner Ken Bacha since it was discovered March 8, 2017, about 10 days after her family reported her as missing.

Neither Assistant District Attorney Pete Caravello nor defense attorneys Brian Aston and Tim Andrews objected to the request from Cable’s family to regain custody of the remains.

Cable’s mother, who attended Tuesday’s hearing, said her daughter’s remains will be taken to the Lopatich Funeral Home. No services or other memorials are planned, she said.

Police contend Ronny Cable, 34, was bludgeoned to death with a hammer in February 2017 before her body was burned by two men deep in the woods following a robbery. Her remains were found a month later after which forensic testing confirmed Cable’s identity.

A year later, police arrested Devin Andrew Akamichi, 26, of Murrysville, and Walter W. Cable, 26, of Greensburg, and charged them with criminal homicide. Walter Cable and Ronny Cable were not related.

Police contend the day of the murder, the group visited a store and local bar then traveled out into the woods, where Walter Cable used a hammer to beat Ronny Cable before he strangled her then forced Akamichi to help him burn her body. Akamichi testified against Cable during a preliminary hearing this year that robbery was a motive and that Walter Cable stole money and prescription medicine from her purse following the murder.

Both Walter Cable and Akamichi appeared in court on Tuesday for a status conference hearings.

Andrews, the attorney for Walter Cable, said he needed more time to prepare the case for trial. He said he needed to review records from a computer seized from Akamichi’s home and a statement given to police from a jailhouse informant who claims to have received information about the killing from Walter Cable.

Trials dates have not been scheduled.

Krieger ordered Walter Cable to return to court in February for another status conference. Akamichi, who has cooperated with police, will appear before Krieger in March.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.