Archive

ShareThis Page
Schimizzi seeks election to Westmoreland County Court bench | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Schimizzi seeks election to Westmoreland County Court bench

473674gtrSchimizzi112418
Submitted
Matt Schimizzi

Attorney Matt Schimizzi of Hempfield announced Friday he’s running for Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court judge in 2019, seeking dual party nominations.

A 2002 Greater Latrobe Senior High graduate, Schimizzi is a partner in his father, Rich’s, Greensburg law firm.

He holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg and a law degree from Duquesne University, graduating magna cum laude in 2009.

A former assistant public defender, he has handled cases involving civil litigation, criminal defense, family law, adoptions, federal bankruptcy, real estate transactions and estate planning and management.

“Serving as a judge is something I’ve always wanted to do,” Schimizzi said.

If he’s elected, he said, he will draw on his legal experience to understand difficult issues that come before the court and “would continue with the efforts of our current judges and explore ways for the court and community organizations to work together to combat the pressing issues of our time,” such as opioid addiction.

Schimizzi is board president of the Union Cemetery of Greensburg and a volunteer with the Stoneybrook Foundation, which operates a therapeutic horseback riding center near Donegal. He is married to the former Lindsey Bell.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.