Sheriff Held’s lawyer wants forensic info on computers taken during office raid |

Sheriff Held’s lawyer wants forensic info on computers taken during office raid

Rich Cholodofsky
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Ryan Tutera, attorney for Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held, speaks after Held's arraignment at District Judge Chris Flanigan's office in Greensburg on Monday, Feb. 26, 2018.
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held arrives at the Greensburg office of District Judge Chris Flanigan on Feb. 26, 2018. Held is accused of ordering his staff to campaign for him while on duty.

The lawyer for embattled Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held wants state prosecutors to immediately turn over results of forensic tests on computers confiscated during a courthouse raid in March.

State agents searched Held’s office about a month after the two-term Republican was charged with three criminal counts in connection with allegations that he directed his staff to perform campaign activities while on the job.

“At this time, the defendant has not received anything from the commonwealth relative to the forensic examination of said computers,” according to court documents filed by defense attorney Ryan Tutera.

Held, 44, of Hempfield, was charged with conflict of interest and two counts of theft. Investigators said Held directed uniformed and on-duty staffers to participate in fundraising activities for the sheriff’s re-election campaign.

The sheriff has maintained his innocence and suggested that the allegations were raised by disgruntled staffers in his office.

During a hearing last month, senior visiting Common Pleas Court Judge Timothy Creany scheduled Held’s trial to begin Aug. 6.

Since that hearing, Held’s defense has sought an extension of time to prepare pretrial motions as well as requests for information from prosecutors about the case against the sheriff. Some of the information requested by the defense includes payroll details involving some of Held’s accusers.

State prosecutors have objected to turning over that information to the defense, saying the sheriff already has access to those records.

The judge has not yet scheduled any hearings to resolve the defense requests.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.