Archive

ShareThis Page
Trial to begin for Monessen man accused of threatening judge with letters, Hannibal Lecter photo | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Trial to begin for Monessen man accused of threatening judge with letters, Hannibal Lecter photo

271451webcourts11WEB

Testimony is slated to begin Wednesday in the harassment trial of a Monessen man charged with threatening a Westmoreland County judge.

A jury was seated Tuesday to hear evidence against Gregg Tchirkow, who prosecutors contend sent threatening letters to Common Pleas Court Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio, including one of fictional movie character Hannibal Lecter.

Tchirkow, 39, is charged with harassment and making terroristic threats. Police said he sent 18 letters to the judge, including one picture of the cannibalistic serial killer portrayed in the movie, “Silence of the Lambs,” by actor Anthony Hopkins. The letters, according to the prosecution, were sent after Bilik-DeFazio sentenced Tchirkow to jail in 2014 for violating terms of his probation in a previous drug conviction.

Tchirkow will defend himself at the trial. He has maintained the letters were not meant to be threatening.

Bilik-DeFazio is the lone prosecution witness scheduled to testify, according to Assistant District Attorney Allen Powanda.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.