WCCC revises purchasing policy |

WCCC revises purchasing policy

Westmoreland County Community College officials hope an updated purchasing policy will give the school more choices when officials look to buy equipment and supplies.

The eight-page policy, approved by trustees in October, replaces three smaller, separate policies and unwritten guidelines the school used to solicit bids and make purchases.

“We’re trying to make our process as competitive as possible. That’s really what all the changes in the purchasing policy were about,” said Larry Larese, chairman of the board of trustees.

At times, trustees have questioned during meetings why there weren’t more bidders for purchases ranging from specialized equipment to printing of mailers or course catalogs.

Under the new policy, college administrators must provide trustees with a written explanation, including the process taken to find qualified bidders, if they don’t receive at least three proposals.

If a bid proposal is sent to 10 vendors and only one bids, it raises questions as to whether the other nine were valid vendors, Larese said.

“We’re wanting the staff to do an even better job at identifying people who really do supply a product or service,” he said. “Maybe if you’re just so busy, maybe you don’t go through the busy process necessary to get the best price, but I think it’s also particularly important, as we’ve been facing tough budgets the last two to three years.”

Funding cuts or flat appropriations from the state and county, combined with declining tuition funds because of drops in enrollment, mean “you have to look in every corner to save money,” Larese said.

From the college’s perspective, the primary goal of the policy is to formalize buying practices and procedures officials were following but weren’t written in a comprehensive policy, said Ron Eberhardt, vice president of administrative services.

The policy retains some previous regulations, such as requiring trustee approval for purchases of $10,000 or more. Purchases of $2,000 to $10,000 require competitive quotes from at least three suppliers but can be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder without trustee approval.

As part of the effort to reform buying practices, WCCC hired James J. Lutz of Hempfield to a newly implemented position of director of purchasing in June 2013. Lutz said he’s spent the last year comparing purchasing policies from other community colleges in Pennsylvania and surrounding states, as well as policies at some four-year universities.

Two other policy changes include establishing a purchasing department, made up of the president and vice president of administrative services, authorized by trustees to commit to purchases. The authority was previously understood, but not formally written, Lutz said.

The policy spells out circumstances under which the college can make purchases without competitive bids, such as when goods or services are needed immediately because of an emergency or when equipment or a part must be compatible with existing items.

In cases without competitive bids, the purchasing department must research the exception to be sure bidding is not possible and must receive the concurrence of the college solicitor and written approval of the president to proceed with the purchase, the policy states.

“The purchasing area has become more technical in terms of the types of purchases we’re making,” said Eberhardt. “Jim’s done a very good job for us … in developing this new policy, and so now we have to implement it.”

Kari Andren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2856 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.