ShareThis Page
Westmoreland officials fear loss of impact fees |

Westmoreland officials fear loss of impact fees

Westmoreland County commissioners aren’t sure what to expect from Gov. Tom Wolf’s proposal to enact a severance tax on Marcellus shale gas well drillers.

What they do know is that they don’t want the revenues the county and local municipalities have received from impact fees since 2012 to dry up.

“The biggest concern I have in Westmoreland County is the way Act 13 is set up, everyone would benefit. Money goes back to the municipalities and the county,” Commissioner Tyler Courtney said. “If it goes to a severance tax, the money goes to Harrisburg and the general fund.”

Last week, Courtney sent a letter to the governor asking for clarification on the administration’s proposal to impose a 5 percent severance tax on the gas that drillers extract.

The governor contends the tax could raise as much as $765 million in its first year, and much of the money would benefit public education.

As part of the proposal, as much as $225 million would be set aside in a separate fund to replace the impact fees that are now collected.

Impact fees this year are expected to generate about $220 million in the state, according to reports. That money is returned to counties and municipalities where gas wells are located.

Westmoreland County received more than $2 million from the impact fees in 2013 and nearly $2.3 million in 2014. Officials expect to receive $1.125 million this year because of fewer wells being drilled in the state and county.

The county’s 67 municipalities received $1.2 million in impact fees in 2013 and $1.3 million last year.

Courtney, a Republican, said the Democratic governor’s proposal could endanger those dollars.

“If I had my druthers, I’d rather stick to the impact fees,” he said. “Westmoreland County has not seen the development other counties have due to Marcellus shale, but we will. And I have concerns about Harrisburg making decisions how those distributions will work.”

Westmoreland officials have used the impact fees to help operate the 911 emergency dispatching services, to boost conservation district efforts and to pay for human service programs. Some money has been allocated to improve bridges and for land conservation programs.

Commissioner Charles Anderson, a Republican, said he opposes Gov. Wolf’s severance tax plan because it will hurt business.

“Any time you put a tax on an industry, you slow it down,” Anderson said. “I’m opposed to any kind of tax. If he is going to replace Act 13 with any other scheme, I’m not in favor of it.”

Commissioner Ted Kopas, a Democrat, said while details of the governor’s plan haven’t been finalized, the county doesn’t stand to lose any funding it receives from impact fees.

“I want to make sure Westmoreland County and the municipalities continue to receive the same funding we’ve gotten accustomed to,” he said. “It is my understanding that the special tax is in addition to and would be above and beyond what the impact fees provided.”

Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.