ShareThis Page
Youngwood leaders frustrated by state’s revival of playground dispute |

Youngwood leaders frustrated by state’s revival of playground dispute

| Friday, May 13, 2016 11:20 p.m
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
According to the State Department of Labor and Industry, Youngwood’s municipal playground still isn’t up to code, and the borough never paid the fees or got the permits required to build it. Youngwood officials believe they’ve already made the necessary changes, are requesting a definitive list of required changes from the department in hopes of ending the year-and-a-half long issue.

Youngwood officials hoped the legal wrangling surrounding code violations at the Sixth Street Playground was over, but a letter from the state Department of Labor & Industry has reignited the longstanding issue.

“I’ve been saying for a year and a half that I just want it to end,” borough council President Lloyd Crago said.

The letter says the playground is not up to code despite several changes that have been made at the state’s request.

Youngwood officials said the letter doesn’t specify what needs to be done to bring the playground into compliance. The letter says the borough lacked a permit to build the playground in the first place and owes fees for the permits it should have acquired.

This came as a surprise to borough leaders, who thought they had satisfied the state’s requirements last year, Crago said.

In August, the borough spent $2,400 on a new swing and picnic table that meets Americans with Disabilities Act standards to address problems found by a state inspector.

“Nobody could give us any direction on what was in violation, and I think they just kept making things up as they went,” Crago said. “We’ve done everything asked of us and they still won’t close this up.”

Borough Solicitor Elsie Lampl is drafting a letter to the Department of Labor & Industry requesting a final, definitive list of what Youngwood needs to do to bring the playground into compliance. She said the borough did not think a permit was necessary when work on the playground started in 2014.

“(Council members) are frustrated because they have no idea they needed it, and they’ve been trying to be in compliance. They just want a list,” Lampl said.

A spokesman for the Department of Labor & Industry said the the Bureau of Occupational and Industrial Safety is investigating the playground’s permitting and inspections, and that the department does not comment on ongoing investigations.

The department handled all building permits and inspections for the borough until this year, after a council vote to contract local inspector Mike Stack to handle the task.

Crago said the change was made to allow more immediate contact between the inspector and property owners. The state would sometimes take a long time to respond to requests, as illustrated by the playground situation, he said.

“We’re following the same rules they do. We’re not changing anything. It’s just being run through the borough now, not the state,” he said. “We can expedite things to help the residents of our town.”

Since the playground was built before Stack took over, it is still under the state’s jurisdiction.

The state issued a stop-work order for the playground while it was under construction in 2014 because of the lack of a permit. The borough submitted some drawings and documents in the hopes that they would satisfy the department, and work continued.

Then inspectors said the playground didn’t comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, which led to the purchase of the swing and picnic table.

“This has been the most frustrating thing. I think it’s been sort of a joke,” Crago said.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.