Archive

ShareThis Page
Dogs placed for adoption after owners from Monroeville arrested | TribLIVE.com
Monroeville

Dogs placed for adoption after owners from Monroeville arrested

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 5, 2014 9:00 p.m.

Pomeranian dogs kept in a home where a Monroeville man was arrested for child pornography are up for adoption.

Tina Marie Patterson, 41, of Monroeville, signed a release Oct. 24 to turn the family’s 10 Pomeranians over to municipal employees. The dogs were in the house on Foxboro Drive that she shared with her husband, Andrew, and teenage daughter.

Allegheny County police charged Andrew Patterson, 45, Oct. 16 with disseminating and possessing child pornography after investigators found more than 1,000 sexually explicit computer files depicting prepubescent children, according to court documents.

Patterson resigned from his position as a youth volunteer with Living Waters Family Worship Center in North Huntingdon.

Monroeville police also charged the couple with a count each of child endangerment after investigators encountered “deplorable” conditions, including floors covered in dog feces and the smell of ammonia and urine.

Monroeville Officer Matthew White, who filed for the seizure of the Patterson dogs, said he did so “for the protection of the dogs.” The animals are being held at the municipal animal shelter on Starr Drive.

Tina Marie Patterson described herself as having been a “hobby breeder” of Pomeranians prior to the arrest of her husband. She said that since then she has thrown away the carpets in her house and cleaned her floors as part of an effort to “get my life back in order.”

Her attorney, John Knorr, declined comment.

Gideon Bradshaw is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-871-2369 or gbradshaw@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.