Archive

ShareThis Page
Gateway School District granted money for school resource officer | TribLIVE.com
Monroeville

Gateway School District granted money for school resource officer

by GIDEON BRADSHAW
| Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:00 p.m.

Gateway School District will receive $60,000 next school year to help pay for its school resource officers.

The district will be one of 114 school districts and municipalities to receive a total of $3.9 million through the Pennsylvania Department of Education, officials said last week.

Two resource officers, one from Pitcairn and on from Monroeville, work in Gateway schools, and the district splits the respective salaries and benefits for them with the departments.

The cost of the Monroeville officer was about $150,000 and the Pitcairn officer roughly $75,000

Assistant superintendent Bill Short said the district will use the grant to help defray the costs of funding the program.

Schools like Gateway that are receiving the grant for the first time will be eligible for a second grant during the 2015-16 school year. Gateway was not the only area district on the list.

Penn Hills received a first-year grant for $39,900.

Allegheny Township received a second-year grant of $30,000 for an officer in Kiski Area School District.

Gideon Bradshaw is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-871-2369 or gbradshaw@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.