Monroeville man charged after allegedly pointing gun at man he hit on I-76 |

Monroeville man charged after allegedly pointing gun at man he hit on I-76

Police lights.File photo

A Monroeville man will face a judge for allegedly pointing a gun at another driver after a traffic incident along I-76.

Donald B. Wilcox, 72, faces nine charges stemming from the incident occurring on the highway in Monroeville.

“While using his cellular phone Wilcox’s vehicle drifted into the left lane occupied by the victim,” said state Trooper Heath Waszo in a complaint filed with Magisterial District Judge Jeffrey Herbst Sept. 4.

Waszo identified the other driver as Mohamed Ewida. He said Wilcox hit Ewida’s car, which caused Ewida to try to get Wilcox to pull over.

“Wilcox then pointed a handgun at Ewida while both their vehicles were still in motion,” Waszo said.

Waszo said Ewida sped up to avoid any confrontation, which ignited a chase. Wilcox tried to hit Ewida’s car twice until Ewida exited and waited at a toll booth’s parking lot for police to arrive.

Wilcox exited the interchange and fled the scene “without exchanging information or reporting the accident to a law enforcement officer,” Waszo said.

Wilcox was charged with simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, failing to report the accident and other charges related to careless driving.

Wilcox awaits a preliminary hearing with Herbst on Oct. 29.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.