Export misses out on federal street-repair grant, will try for next year |

Export misses out on federal street-repair grant, will try for next year

Patrick Varine
Patrick Varine | Tribune-Review
Calisti Drive, above, will be included in Export Borough’s application for 2019 federal Community Development Block Grant funding. It was the only street on the 2018 application where a sufficient number of residents filled out the required income survey.

Export officials will apply for annual federal grants to repair streets in 2019, having been unable to obtain funding this year after uncooperative residents prevented the borough from meeting the application requirements.

To qualify for Community Development Block Grant funding in 2018, borough officials needed to obtain income surveys from at least 80 percent of residents on the five streets where work was to take place.

Federal officials track those figures to determine the number of projects serving low- to moderate-income residents.

With many citing privacy concerns, even when given the option to simply fill out the form and mail it rather than hand it to a borough official, residents on only one of the proposed streets — Calisti Drive — met the survey threshold.

Calisti will be added to next year’s list of targeted streets, which includes Lincoln, Henry and Tyler avenues and Van Buren and Harding streets.

Council voted 6-0 to submit the application information. Councilman Ed Persin was not present.

“There’s no guarantee (that we’ll get the grant), but we need to get (the application) done,” council President Barry Delissio said.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.