Archive

ShareThis Page
Franklin Regional takes top Calcu-Solve individual, team honors | TribLIVE.com
Murrysville

Franklin Regional takes top Calcu-Solve individual, team honors

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:00 p.m.
msCalcuSolve1112014
Submitted photo
From the left, Connor Canobbio placed third overall, Marissa Mansour placed second overall and Praneel Varshney placed first overall in the Calcu-Solve tournament.
msCalcuSolve2112014
Submitted photo
Franklin Regional students did very well in the recent Calcu-Solve tournament. In front, from left, is Connor Canobbio, Joshua Selvakumar, Chloe Zucco, Praneel Varshney, Carli Ramchandran, Kylie Senge, and Darius Colangelo. In back row are Nichole Poltinnikov, Beyla Holbrook, Sreethi Ramineni, Elaina Ciecierski, Abhinav Komanduri, Thomas Hieber, Atharva Mayekar, Conor Hutchison, and Marissa Mansour;

Franklin Regional students took the top three individual honors and top two team honors during a Calcu-Solve event hosted by Derry Area chapter of the Pennsylvania Association for Gifted Education, or PAGE.

The local fourth- and fifth-graders used critical thinking skills to solve higher-level mathematics questions as they competed against students from the Derry Area, Greater Latrobe, Greensburg Salem, Kiski Area, Penn Trafford, and Southmoreland school districts.

In the individual competition, Praneel Varshney of Heritage Elementary took first place, Marissa Mansour of Newlonsburg finished second, and Connor Canobbio of Sloan finished third.

The first-place team was made up of Marissa, Praneel and Heritage students Thomas Hieber and Darius Colangelo. The second-place team featured Connor and Sloan students Conor Hutchison, Abhinav Komanduri, and Atharva Mayekar.

Elaina Ciecierski, Nichole Poltinnikov, Joshua Selvakumar, Kylie Senge and Chloe Zucco also represented the district in the competition.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.