Murrysville council will make Sloan ‘elementary campus’ decision Oct. 17 |

Murrysville council will make Sloan ‘elementary campus’ decision Oct. 17

Patrick Varine | Tribune-Review

Murrysville council’s decision on the Franklin Regional School District elementary campus project will be made on Oct. 17, and council will schedule a special meeting for Oct. 10 in case its members need extra time to discuss the project.

The school district wants to consolidate its elementary students onto the Sloan campus off Sardis Road, renovating the existing school and building a new one along Crowfoot Road, with a site plan and conditional-use applications awaiting council’s decision.

The school district began planning the project in 2016.

Murrysville solicitor George Kotjarapoglus said any conditions the municipality will require of the school district need to be finalized and agreed to at council’s Oct. 3 meeting — or failing that, at the Oct. 10 special meeting — so that a written decision could be delivered when it meets Oct. 17.

Those conditions could include a request to provide a bond or some other form of security for future traffic improvements, which preliminary estimates put at nearly $3 million according to Murrysville Chief Administrator Jim Morrison. Issues like the weight limits and width of the Crowfoot Road and Sardis bridges have been called into question by council members as well as members of the public.

School officials agreed to a two-week extension on council’s final decision, which was initially due by its Oct. 3 meeting.

Attorney Robert Wratcher, representing the school district, said he would be in attendance Oct. 3 to respond to council’s conditions.

Wratcher also said the district is willing to plan a post-occupancy traffic study, ,”to look at things for real, once the project is complete, and see what may need to be addressed.”

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.