Archive

ShareThis Page
Murrysville homeowners seek help for Claridge Road runoff woes | TribLIVE.com
Murrysville

Murrysville homeowners seek help for Claridge Road runoff woes

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:00 p.m

Several Claridge Road residents want something done about their storm-water runoff problems, but municipal and state officials are pointing fingers at each other when it comes to which is responsible for fixing them.

Mike Lancaster and his family moved into a home in the Murrysville section of Claridge Road in 2009.

“Within a year, there was one of those super-cell type of storms, and our garage filled up with about 4 feet of water,” Lancaster said.

Next door to the Lancasters, longtime resident Diane Burns also has dealt with a host of runoff problems.

“When it starts to rain heavily, it just starts coming over top of my driveway,” said Burns, who grew up in her home on the 5000 block of Claridge Road.

“It’s a problem for people all along the road, but all my neighbors are doing what they can to divert their water to me, and there’s nothing I can do with it,” Burns told Murrysville council last month.

Burns lives in what might be called a “bathtub” section of Claridge Road, the lowest point between two hills. She has installed a French drain that is about a foot wide and more than 50 feet long on the northern side of her property but said even it cannot handle the runoff she receives.

Lancaster said shortly after moving in, he had a two-ton earth mound installed on the front of his property to try to push water back toward the road.

“But we’ve still gotten some water in the garage over the years,” he said.

Efforts to address the situation have left both Burns and Lancaster frustrated.

Murrysville chief administrator Jim Morrison said the Claridge runoff problems have been an issue for two decades. He told council that he has approached PennDOT and state legislators about it.

“The state does not recognize that they have a responsibility for storm-water management on that street,” he said.

PennDOT Spokeswoman Valerie Petersen took the opposite position.

“The drainage on that section of (Claridge) is located in Murrysville, and it is Murrysville’s to maintain by state law,” Petersen said. “They control the building permits, which controls the runoff.”

State Rep. Eli Evankovich (R-Murrysville) said his office has “been trying to get Murrysville and PennDOT to come to an agreement for the last three years.

“I don’t think anyone disagrees that there’s a problem that needs fixed,” he said. “My personal opinion is that PennDOT, while they have a legal basis to stand on for their decision, ultimately should be the ones responsible for local drainage on roads that they own.”

Lancaster characterized his attempts to find a solution as “kind of comical.”

“I contacted PennDOT and they wouldn’t do anything about it,” he said. “I contacted Evankovich, and he came out and basically said the state should be fixing it.”

Shortly afterward, Lancaster said, municipal officials proposed the construction of two catch basins on his and Burns’ side of the road, which would be linked to existing storm drains on the opposite side.

“But PennDOT wouldn’t pay for the work,” he said. “That’s the No. 1 problem here: We don’t have any storm drains on our side of the road.”

Patrick Varine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-871-2365 or pvarine@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.