Leukemia, Lymphoma Society seek Students of the Year nominations |
North Hills

Leukemia, Lymphoma Society seek Students of the Year nominations

Kate Burke, a junior at North Catholic High School, earned the title of 2018 Student of the Year and a $2,500 scholarship by fundraising the most money for The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society over the course of a seven-week period earlier this year. She was presented the check by Semper Gratus Founder Ian Coyle. Semper Gratus is a Pittsburgh-based, non-profit charity.

The Western Pennsylvania & West Virginia Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) is seeking nominations of teen philanthropists to compete for the title of Students of the Year.

Students of the Year is a seven-week philanthropic leadership development program for high school-aged students to engage family, friends and community in their efforts to raise the most money for blood cancer research and patient services. The student who raises the most money at the end of the competition receives a $2,500 scholarship and a job shadowing opportunity.

Teens who participate in this competition should be enthusiastic about volunteerism, philanthropy, community outreach, leadership and college preparedness. As they compete in the Students of the Year campaign, these students develop skills that allow them to stand out among peers when engaging with colleges and/or future employers. Through guidance and mentoring from experienced professionals at LLS, they will make a real impact in the fight against blood cancers.

The 2019 campaign will kick off on Jan. 19, 2019.

Potential candidates must submit an application online via . The application deadline is Oct. 31, 2018.

For questions, to nominate a candidate, or to get involved, contact Kayla McGrath, Students of the Year Campaign Specialist at 412-395-2877 or [email protected] .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.