McCandless seeks applications for 9 openings on resident advisory groups |
North Hills

McCandless seeks applications for 9 openings on resident advisory groups


Applications are being accepted from residents to fill nine seats on various volunteer boards, commissions and authorities that will become vacant at the end of the year.

The openings are for terms expiring Dec. 31 for the following advisory groups:

• Personnel Board, 0ne three-year term

• Planning Commission, two four-year terms

• Zoning Hearing Board, one three-year term

• Zoning Hearing Board, one three-year alternate term

• McCandless Industrial Development Authority, one five-year term

• McCandless-Franklin Park Ambulance Authority, one five-year term

• McCandless Township Sanitary Authority, one five-year term

• Code Appeals Board, one four-year term

An applicant also is being sought to fill an unexpired term on the Zoning Hearing Board that was created by a resignation. The resident appointed to complete the term will serve until Dec., 31, 2020.

Qualified applicants will be interviewed by town council, who will vote on the appointments based on the town’s policy to fill such positions.

Residents can get an application online and return it by email to: [email protected] Applications also can be mailed or dropped off at: Town of McCandless, 9955 Grubbs Road, Wexford, PA 15090.

The deadline to apply is 5 p.m.m on Friday, Oct. 12.

More information is available online .

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or [email protected] or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.