Douglas resigns as North Irwin mayor after five years |

Douglas resigns as North Irwin mayor after five years

North Irwin Mayor James Douglas resigned from borough government last week.

In a letter read at the Nov. 10 council meeting, Douglas said he was proud to have served as mayor for the past five years and that his resignation stems from changes in his life, which he did not specify.

Douglas wrote that he’s proud to have helped create “a calmer, more productive” environment in borough government, and he noted that one month into his tenure, he received a trial by anything but fire when the region was hit with a heavy snowstorm.

“I will never forget the efforts of the borough workers and the fire hall that day as I called a state of emergency. I will never forget delivering food gift cards with RONI (Recreation Organization of North Irwin) to help those in our borough. I will not forget the many kind faces of those I have met while serving as mayor,” he wrote.

Douglas also challenged borough council to support the North Irwin Volunteer Fire Department and RONI.

Council member John McIntire spoke highly of the former mayor.

“He was a very good man,” McIntire said. “I hope people understand that we liked him as our mayor and that even though things changed for him and he had to move on, we wish him well.”

Residents of the borough can send letters of interest to apply for the mayor’s position to the town hall building at 21 Second St., North Irwin, PA 15642.

Council President Michael Schade will serve as acting mayor until a new mayor is chosen.

Liquid-fuels money

Officials said the borough was allocated about $21,500 in state liquid-fuels funding through PennDOT.

This money is allocated based on the mileage and population of the borough. It’s used to pay for road maintenance and to pay for streetlights.

Christy Walters is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.