ShareThis Page
North Huntingdon police arrest suspected heroin dealer following sting |

North Huntingdon police arrest suspected heroin dealer following sting

| Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:00 p.m
Braden James Williams, Jr.

A Turtle Creek man is accused of selling heroin in a North Huntingdon convenience store’s parking lot on Route 30.

Township police recently charged Braden James Williams Jr., 23, with two counts each of possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and delivery of a controlled substance.

Williams’ lawyer, Angela Rene Carisa, could not be reached for comment.

Investigators with the state Attorney General’s Westmoreland County Drug Task Force, which included officers from the township, used an informant to buy a “brick” containing 50 packets of the heroin for $300 on Nov. 26 in the parking lot of a Sheetz convenience store along Route 30, according to a criminal complaint filed to support the charges.

The street value of the drugs was between $750 and $1,000, according to authorities.

Williams is accused of trying to sell heroin at the same spot March 21. The street value of the second batch of drugs was between $3,000 and $4,000, authorities said.

North Huntingdon police and the Attorney General’s office did not comment.

A preliminary hearing was delayed until June 18. Williams was in the Westmoreland County Jail in lieu of a $25,000 cash bond.

Tony LaRussa is a Trib Total Media staff writer.

Categories: Norwin
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.