Archive

Norwin rises in assessment of state schools | TribLIVE.com
Norwin

Norwin rises in assessment of state schools

Norwin improved academically in the last school year, compared to the previous year, while the achievement at other Westmoreland County school districts dipped, according to the grade that state education officials use to gauge school performance.

Even though scores for two of Norwin’s seven schools — Sheridan Terrace and Stewartsville elementary schools — dropped last year compared to the previous school year, the district’s average grade went up by 3.5 percent, from 81.59 in 2012-13 to 84.44 in 2013-14.

On average, the grade for Westmoreland County’s 17 school districts dropped 0.7 percent from 80.17 in 2012-13 to 79.60 in 2013-14, according to the state Department of Education’s most recent School Performance Profiles.

Natalie McCracken, the district’s assistant superintendent of elementary education, said the drop in grades at Sheridan Terrace and Stewartsville shouldn’t alarm parents.

“Going down one point is not statistically significant,” she said. “The schools are still demonstrating that they are meeting or exceeding state expectations.”

Superintendent William Kerr said while the administration is “overall pleased” with its schools’ grades, “what we try to do at Norwin is continually improve and ensure that we have the human and financial resources to help our students demonstrate growth and achievement.”

The grades issued by the state are weighted to reflect statewide student exams; overall academic growth; graduation, attendance and promotion rates; and performance factors for English-language learners and children from low-income homes, according to state education officials.

The school performance profiles, which are available at paschoolperformance.org, replace the Adequate Yearly Progress goals mandated by the federal No Child Left Behind law.

School performance results from 2012-13 showed that nearly 73 percent of schools statewide received a 70 or more on a 100-point scale, about half a percentage point greater than in 2013-14. Statewide, no county’s grade increased or dropped more than five points from its average in 2012-13.

Tracy McNelly, Norwin’s assistant superintendent of secondary education, said the gains made by district school can be attributed, in part, to “spending last year aligning our math, science and English curricula to the newly adopted Pennsylvania Core Standards.”

“As teachers aligned and rewrote portions of the curriculum, they implemented these practices into the classroom,” she said.

Norwin also has been working to identify academically at-risk students so they can receive extra help along with providing professional development to teacher in all grades, McNelly said.

McCracken said that at Hillcrest Intermediate School, where the score increased from 70.9 to 82.7, or 16.7 percent — the greatest increase among Norwin schools — teachers were organized into teams of three: one for English language arts, another for social studies and a third for math and science.

The change is “believed to have had a positive impact on student learning,” she said.

Release of this year’s profiles were delayed by six weeks while state officials verified information with local schools.

Last year, acting education Secretary Carolyn Dumaresq twice delayed school scores because of a testing error that led to mistakes for 20 percent of the state’s 3,000 schools. Final results were posted two months after the website’s October launch.

Tony LaRussa is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.