Norwin school board nixes plan to fix Hahntown attendance zone |

Norwin school board nixes plan to fix Hahntown attendance zone

When Norwin school officials redrew school boundary lines in 2007 to accommodate the opening of Hahntown Elementary, five streets were assigned to the wrong elementary school.

Last Monday, the school board considered — then scrapped — a proposal to fix the mistake beginning with the next school year.

“The reason this occurred was an error on the district’s part,” said board President Robert Perkins, who said only six students currently are attending the wrong school.

The streets assigned to the wrong grade school are Kingsbury and September lanes; Sandy Hill and Nike roads; and Oakside Drive. Students from those streets should be attending Sheridan Terrace Elementary instead of Hahntown, according to district officials.

The six children who might have been affected by the change all live on Kingsbury, according to Natalie McCracken, the district’s assistant superintendant of elementary education.

Over the past several months, officials have discussed correcting the error, but Perkins said “it would be more palatable to do it when we are shifting the whole school district around instead of singling out the six kids.”

Although there aren’t any immediate plans to redraw elementary school boundaries, Perkins said, it eventually will happen.

“I have no doubt that we’re going to have to do it. We’ve done it before,” he said.

The attendance areas for the district’s four elementary schools periodically are redrawn to prevent buildings from becoming crowded as neighborhoods grow, according to Rod Stewart, the district’s director of transportation.

Board member Darlene Ciocca said it makes sense to wait until boundaries are redrawn across the district instead of making a change now.

“There’s a chance that they (the six students) will be moved again, which could be difficult for these parents,” she said. “I say, ‘Leave them where they are for now.’ ”

Board member Thomas Sturm said he preferred to move the students to their correct school starting with the next school year because, based on his experience, there is no guarantee that children won’t have to switch schools more than once to accommodate shifts in population.

“When I first moved here (in 1975), our assigned school changed three years in a row,” Sturm said. “It’s possible that it could change back and forth for these children because it has happened in the past.”

Stewart, who was directed to prepare the measure for the board’s consideration, said that given the likelihood that redistricting is “coming down the road, it just wouldn’t be a popular decision” to move students at this time.

Tony LaRussa is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.