ShareThis Page
Norwin student clears path to state geography bee |

Norwin student clears path to state geography bee

Joe Napsha
| Thursday, March 29, 2018 11:06 a.m
Brady Johnson

A seventh-grade Norwin Middle School student is heading to the National Geographic Society’s state geography bee championship in Harrisburg on April 6.

Brady Johnson will be one of about 100 top-scoring semifinalists students the National Geographic Society has invited to compete in the state bees.

“It is always a thrill to send a Norwin Middle School representative to the state level competition. We could not be prouder of Brady and wish him lots of luck as he moves on to the state level,” said Kristen Ummer, a Norwin Middle School social studies teacher and National Geographic Bee coordinator.

Brady qualified for the state championship through geography bees held at Norwin in January. He took an online qualifying test in February and was notified in March that he qualified for the state championship in Harrisburg.

“I became interested in geography around third grade. I really enjoyed building puzzles, and I had several state and continent puzzles. I also loved to play the apps — Stack the States and Stack the Countries,” said Brady, the son of Neil and Wendy Johnson, who teaches American studies at Norwin Middle School.

If Brady wins the state championship, he would get $200, an atlas and a trip to Washington, D.C., to represent Pennsylvania in the National Geographic Bee Championship, held from May 20-23.

The national champion receives a $50,000 college scholarship, a lifetime membership in the society and an all-expenses-paid expedition to the Galápagos Islands aboard the new National Geographic Endeavour II.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, or via Twitter .

Categories: Norwin
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.