Hunter rescued after fall from Penn Hills tree stand |
Penn Hills

Hunter rescued after fall from Penn Hills tree stand

Penn Hills emergency responders dealt with rugged terrain and the setting sun while responding to a hunting injury last week in a wooded area.

Penn Hills fire departments, police, EMS and Plum EMS rescued a 38-year-old man who fell between 20 and 30 feet from a tree stand while hunting. He was transported to UPMC Presbyterian by helicopter on Nov. 11.

Diane Fitzhenry, Penn Hills EMS supervisor, said a call came in at about 4:15 p.m. that a hunter was injured about one mile into a wooded area off of Dalecrest Road.

The hunter used a walkie talkie to inform his friend when he fell, police Chief Howard Burton said.

The location made it more difficult to transport the patient in a timely fashion, Fitzhenry said, but weather worked in the patient’s favor.

“This guy was pretty lucky,” Fitzhenry said.

“The weather was relatively warm, so he didn’t have to worry about hypothermia.”

Burton and Fitzhenry said it was unclear who owned the land where the man was hunting.

“The take-home lesson here is that if at all possible, always have a buddy with you,” Fitzhenry said.

She also encouraged hunters to keep communication devices on them and to dress warmly.

Kelsey Shea is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7845 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.