Money raised from Verona wrestling event disbursed |
Penn Hills

Money raised from Verona wrestling event disbursed

Michael DiVittorio
Lower Valley Athletic Foundation members Julianna Keens, Vince Flotta Jr. and Timothy Long Jr. (in grey shirts) present charitable donations to Verona Fire Chief Ray Suchevich, kneeling, borough recreation board liaison Janet Loalbo and Jerry Kenna, borough manager and founder of the Blue Force Foundation.

Lower Valley Athletic Foundation raised around $3,000 from the inaugural Battle in the Borough wrestling event Aug. 25.

Lawrenceville-based prowrestling promotion KSWA superstars performed at Cribbs Field along South Avenue in Verona that evening.

Proceeds were distributed to various organizations at the Sept. 11 borough council meeting.

Disbursements included $100 for the Verona Volunteer Fire Department, $100 for Lower Valley Ambulance Service, $200 for the Blue Force Foundation and $1,900 for the Verona parks and recreation department. Remaining funds went back to LVAF to support more programs.

LVAF Secretary/Treasurer Timothy Long called the event a success, and hopes to build on it next year.

“It makes me feel good to be able to put these things together and raise money for good causes,” he said.

Money was raised through ticket sales, 50/50 and basket raffles and concession stand sales.

More information about Lower Valley Athletic Foundation is available at and on

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.