Archive

Penn Hills considers updating code enforcement to fight blight | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Penn Hills considers updating code enforcement to fight blight

Penn Hills Community Development Corporation leaders say that a new vacant property ordinance is a good step to reduce blight, but that the code enforcement department needs more staff and resources.

“We are all concerned because of our property values,” Irene McLaughlin, chairperson of the group’s economic development committee and housing committee, said at the Nov. 17 council meeting.

Development corporation leaders would like council to build a larger staff and use code-enforcement technology more effectively as they develop the 2015 budget.

The nonprofit group, started in 2009, would like to see an update in the software that is used to digitally write citations as well as changes in the tenancy occupancy permits.

The four code-enforcement officers are “busy” and “constantly responding to complaints,” municipal manager Mohammed Rayan said, adding that the municipality always has had four code-enforcement officers.

The number of officers is based on a national average, he said.

He could not say whether there would be money in the budget for new hires.

“If there’s a need for additional staff, we will certainly make sure to adjust to that,” he said.

The code-enforcement department receives about 1,000 complaints each year.

John McCafferty, acting director of the code-enforcement department, said there has been an increase in complaints filed and employees are handling cases as quickly as they can.

An uptick in vacant properties and non-owner occupied homes in Penn Hills has created an unprecedented amount of code complaints, he said.

“We have a great more need for code enforcement than we’ve ever seen before,” McLaughlin said.

Planning Director Howard Davidson said it is difficult to determine the number of abandoned properties but that the amount of abandoned, foreclosed or blighted properties is increasing.

In 2001, Penn Hills had 72 foreclosed or vacant properties. In 2005 there were 159, and in 2008 there were 179.

At the Nov. 17 meeting, council approved a vacant-property ordinance that will give the municipality more tools to address blight and abandoned properties.

The ordinance sets stricter maintenance requirements for vacant properties, requires owners to pay registration fees on vacant properties and calls for the municipality to create a database listing all vacant properties.

McLaughlin said that the CDC members view this as a positive step but that code enforcement must be improved as well.

Deputy Mayor Sara Kuhn met with the CDC earlier this month to discuss code enforcement and called the meeting “productive” for both parties.

Kuhn said she thinks code enforcement is on the right track, citing a recent ordinance dealing with abandoned cars, the vacant property ordinance and the requirement that all new hires be trained to use new software.

Kelsey Shea is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7845 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.