ShareThis Page
Public hearing rescheduled for request to sell beer, wine at Penn Hills GetGo |
Penn Hills

Public hearing rescheduled for request to sell beer, wine at Penn Hills GetGo

Lillian DeDomenic | For the Tribune-Review
Approval to sell beer at the GetGo store on Frankstown Road may hinge on whether it is within 300 feet of the Hebron United Presbyterian Church property.

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board will host a public hearing March 14 about GetGo’s license transfer request to allow it to sell beer and wine at its 10525 Frankstown Road location in Penn Hills.

A Feb. 7 public hearing was canceled.

Giant Eagle, which operates the GetGo chain of convenience stores and gas stations, applied for a license transfer from a former business in North Versailles a year ago. It withdrew that request in March because some Penn Hills council members said they were against selling alcoholic beverages at that store.

Giant Eagle’s second request came in April, when it applied for a license from the former Vincent’s Pizza Park on Frankstown Road. Since the license would be transferred within the municipality, the company does not have to seek approval from the council before proceeding, LCB spokesman Shawn Kelly said.

Hebron United Presbyterian Church filed a protest with the LCB in May, prompting a public hearing.

It will take place at 12 p.m. at the Penn Hills office of the LCB, 158 Purity Road, in the conference room. Kelly said audio and video recording of the meeting is prohibited.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.