ShareThis Page
$90,000 DCNR grant will help to fund tree planting along Plum Creek |

$90,000 DCNR grant will help to fund tree planting along Plum Creek

| Monday, January 30, 2017 11:00 p.m

Trees will be planted along Plum Creek through a program made possible by a state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources grant.

State officials announced last week the Allegheny County Conservation District was awarded the $90,000 grant. It is being administered through the Allegheny Watershed Alliance, which will oversee the planting of 2,000 trees in five area watersheds.

“We’re very excited about it,” said Alliance Executive Director Rebecca Zeyzus. “We’re doing two acres in each of the five watersheds. This will take place over five years.”

Other county streams to benefit from the grant include Montour Run, Peters Creek, Turtle Creek and Streets Run.

“We selected five watersheds based on the presence of existing watershed groups or strong municipal collaboration,” said Zeyzus. “We’re starting site analysis and querying people. We want people to understand why it’s important to care about the environment and our water resources.”

The trees will serve as stream bank buffers. They will help slow creek erosion, improve water quality, intercept water runoff, provide shade and places for wildlife, Zeyzus said.

Communities impacted by the program include Plum, Oakmont, Monroeville, Penn Hills, Verona, Munhall, Homestead, South Hills, South Park and Murrysville.Zeyzus said the project cost is approximately $200,000, with the conservation district contributing $129,000 through in-kind services, expertise and some finances.

The grant was given through the DCNR Riparian Forest Buffer Grant Program, which will provide for the planting of up to 25,000 trees alongside a number of Pennsylvania streams.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367 or

Categories: Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.