ShareThis Page
A new Riverview School District sign will replace an eyesore in Oakmont |

A new Riverview School District sign will replace an eyesore in Oakmont

Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Riverview High School

A Riverview High School sign, which district officials called an eyesore, will come down.

The black sign with white lettering sits near the intersection of Hulton Road and Third Street in Oakmont.

It’s on a Peoples Gas meter house built in the 1970s.

Peoples Spokesman Barry Kukovich said the building will remain with some aesthetic upgrades.

“It’s part of the infrastructure of the school, and it’s there to protect the meter,” Kukovich said. “That’s a beautiful area there, especially since Hulton Road has been modernized. We’re willing to plant shrubberies around it and mask it from view, which is what we’ve done for a lot of meter houses.”

The company also committed $3,000 to the district.

Carrie DelRosso, district PR/communications specialist and Oakmont councilwoman, said the money will be used for a new sign closer toward the main entrance of the school.

“Riverview is grateful for the donation, and as an Oakmont borough official, I am happy to have the support of Peoples’s Gas in our school safety zone,” she said.

It was unclear when the sign would come down and a new one would be installed.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.