ShareThis Page
Devil’s in the details for return of Plum police K-9 unit |

Devil’s in the details for return of Plum police K-9 unit

Michael DiVittorio
| Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:06 p.m
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune-Review
Plum Police Officer Lee Temple and 'Voda' conduct a mock drug search during a K-9 training for multiple departments at Plum High School on Thursday, July 6, 2017.

Residents who have been pushing Plum to restore its police K-9 program will have to wait at least until December to see the fruits of their labor.

Council was expected Monday to reinstate the program it had decided to eliminate at the end of the year. But details — such as what will be expected of K-9 Officer Lee Temple and his dog — are still being worked out.

“In the course of finalizing policy, we decided we needed a job description,” said councilman and personnel committee chairman, Dave Seitz.

Seitz said the policy will give the police chief more flexibility when it comes to job assignments and scheduling of the K-9 officer.

Police Chief Jeff Armstrong and council members would not discuss what other details need to be hammered out before the program is put back in place.

Council’s next voting meeting is 7 p.m. Dec. 11 at the borough building, 4575 New Texas Road.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367, or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, or via Twitter .

Categories: Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.