DUI, theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Zucco in Plum |

DUI, theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Zucco in Plum


District Judge Linda Zucco recently handled the following cases. Charges filed by Plum police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Antonio Lindsey, 41, of Monroeville on charges of simple assault, criminal mischief and providing false reports. Charges were filed July 3.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Anthony Bowser, 28, of Plum on charges of driving under the influence, following too closely, careless driving and restrictions on alcoholic beverages. Charges were filed June 7.
  • Clifford Myers, 59, of Natrona Heights on charges of driving under the influence. Charges were filed July 8.
  • Michael Pesanka, 33, of Munhall on charges of driving under the influence, failure to keep right, driving at unsafe speed and careless driving. Oakmont police filed the charges May 24.
  • Steven Whiteman, 39, of Plum on charges of driving under the influence and careless driving. Charges were filed July 11.
  • Abigail Tucker, 36, of Plum on charges of theft from a motor vehicle and identity theft. Charges were filed July 14. Tucker went before the judge on another case. She waived a preliminary hearing on charges of criminal mischief and disorderly conduct. Charges were filed July 22.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.