Former Plum High School substitute teacher headed to court |

Former Plum High School substitute teacher headed to court


A former long-term substitute teacher at Plum High School, charged with statutory sexual assault and unlawful contact with a minor, waived his preliminary hearing before Plum District Judge Linda Zucco.

Plum police filed charges against Louis Thon III, 25, of Pittsburgh on Aug. 23. He was scheduled to go before Zucco Sept. 12. His formal arraignment was scheduled for Nov. 1.

Thon is accused of having a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old boy in 2016, according to the criminal complaint.

A Plum administrator received a call March 26 from a parent alleging inappropriate behavior by a Kelly Educational Staffing employee working as a substitute for the district, according to a district statement.

The employee was immediately escorted off campus and barred from district property.

On Aug. 29, the district obtained a copy of an arrest report, which indicated the alleged incident took place prior to the substitute’s work in the district.

“We have, and will continue to fully cooperate with law enforcement as they work to bring to justice any person who chooses to do harm to children,” the district statement reads.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.